SIGNIFICANCE
Comparison between the role of spatial and temporal contrast sensitivities in the association with reading may provide insight into how visual tasks (such as reading) are related to primary optical or neural (or both) effects. More insight into primary visual factors influencing reading is important for understanding reading problems.
PURPOSE
The aim of this study was to gain insight into the association between optical and neural components of contrast sensitivity (CS), operationalized as spatial CS (optical and neural) or temporal CS (solely neural), and reading speed in a clinical sample of participants with macular pathologies. The precision and agreement were also investigated.
METHODS
The Mars test and temporal CS implementation of the C-Quant device were used to measure spatial CS and temporal CS, respectively. Tests were performed with 47 participants: mean age, 77 years (range, 52 to 92 years). Associations were investigated with correlations and linear regression models. Precision was defined by coefficients of repeatability. The 95% limits of agreement between spatial CS and temporal CS values were assessed.
RESULTS
Reading speed correlated with both spatial CS (r = 0.35, P = .015) and temporal CS (r = 0.66, P < .001). After correction for visual acuity, central loss, and education level, the association between temporal CS and reading speed was not significant anymore. The coefficients of repeatability and reproducibility were 0.20 and 0.28 log unit (spatial CS) and 0.33 and 0.35 log unit (temporal CS), respectively. The values for temporal CS were 0.08 and 0.13 log unit higher than those for spatial CS.
CONCLUSIONS
For spatial CS and temporal CS, moderate to strong correlations were found, respectively, with reading speed in patients with maculopathies. The stronger association between temporal CS and reading speed is suggested to reflect a high sensitivity for neural integrity of temporal CS. The differences in coefficients of repeatability and reproducibility could be explained by the psychometrical differences between methods.
My eight year old daughter was terrified to go to the eye doctor for fear of her eyes being dilated. The doctor was SO KID friendly! He immediately made her comfortable by engaging her in conversation. It was a geat experience.
Dr. Garbus spent an amazing amount of time to solve my very complicated visual problems. Over the years he has continually achieved results beyond what others felt possible. He is always up to date on the latest science. He is great!
Family Vision Care Valencia makes it so easy. Staff is knows what they are doing and Dr. Garbus is thorough and kept me well informed during the exam.
I have been coming to Family Vision Center for almost 20 years. Dr. Garbus has been able to help my vision when other doctors could not. Now my kids see him as well. I highly recommend this office!
The Doctor is very good. I felt on this visit he seemed rushed. I had questions to ask him but he was already with another patient. I still do not know if my eyes are the same , worse, or better.
All the staff is friendly, helpful and knowledgeable, and has been for all the years I have been going there.
Pediatric eye health is a critical aspect of a child’s life and development. Good vision is not just about clarity but a functional system that is flexible and efficient, influencing a child's learning, development, behavior, and stamina. However, the excessive use of digital media devices such as television, cellular phones, tablets, and computers by children […]
Welcome to Amplify EyeCare Santa Clarita, where we provide our patients with high-quality eye care services and optical products in a comfortable and caring environment. In this blog, we will take you on a tour of our optometry clinic and optical, led by our founder and optometrist, Dr. Carl Garbus. Let's take a look at […]
Macular degeneration is the leading cause of blindness in older adults in the United States. Approximately 20 million adults in the US suffer from age-related macular degeneration (AMD). A recent study reveals that the number of AMD cases has doubled from previous estimates. In 2019, 18 million people over 40 were diagnosed with early-stage AMD, […]
